The Impact of Fatphobia on Health Outcomes
Understanding Weight Stigma Through a Fat Liberation Lens
What is Fatphobia?

Fatphobia (also called weight stigma or weight bias) is the discrimination or stereotyping based on a person's body size and weight.

"Fatness is associated with beauty, health and discipline, while fatness is often perceived as morally deviant and fat individuals are labelled as lazy, ugly, unhealthy and lacking willpower."
— Research from healthcare settings in Brazil and Spain
  • Operates as a form of symbolic violence reproduced across social institutions
  • Affects education, workplace, healthcare, family relationships, and leisure activities
  • One of the last forms of discrimination still condoned by society
The Scale of the Problem
66%
Increase in weight discrimination as public health campaigns focused on "ending obesity"
  • Weight discrimination occurs at rates comparable to racism
  • Physicians report discomfort: 24% uncomfortable having friends in larger bodies, 18% feel disgusted treating patients with high BMI
  • Weight bias begins in childhood and intensifies through adolescence into adulthood
How Fatphobia Directly Harms Health

Critical Finding: Research shows that experiencing weight stigma is independently associated with worse health outcomes, even after controlling for BMI and other factors.

  • Physiological stress: Weight stigma consistently raises cortisol levels and stress responses, directly tied to negative health outcomes
  • Increased disease risk: Association with heart disease, stomach ulcers, diabetes, and high cholesterol
  • 60% increased risk of death associated with experiences of weight stigma
  • Mental health impacts: Anxiety, depression, substance use, and increased suicidality
Medical Fatphobia: Barriers to Care

Medical fatphobia creates systematic barriers to quality healthcare:

  • Diagnostic errors: Tumors and serious conditions missed when providers focus only on weight
  • Healthcare avoidance: Fat patients avoid medical care due to past negative experiences, leading to delayed diagnosis and treatment
  • Inadequate facilities: Medical equipment and facilities not designed for fat bodies
  • Reduced quality of care: Provider bias reduces empathy and creates pessimism about treatment outcomes
  • Delays in treatment: Fat patients seen as "unworthy of medical time" and experience delays in specialist referrals
Research shows these negative experiences lead to trauma, poorer long-term outcomes, and internalization of weight bias
What Research Often Misses

From fat liberation scholars: Fatphobia is always the X factor in obesity research

"More than a quarter of the relationship between higher body weight and health is caused by discrimination"
— Harvard analysis of 21,000+ Americans

Most research examining weight and health fails to account for:

  • The stress of experiencing discrimination and stigma
  • Weight cycling from repeated dieting attempts
  • Healthcare avoidance and delayed treatment
  • Barriers to physical activity (harassment, lack of appropriate clothing/equipment)
  • Social determinants: housing, employment, mental health, trauma
Fat Liberation Perspectives

Key voices and works in the fat liberation movement:

Aubrey Gordon — "What We Don't Talk About When We Talk About Fat" & "You Just Need to Lose Weight"

Sonya Renee Taylor — "The Body Is Not an Apology"

Sabrina Strings — "Fearing the Black Body: The Racial Origins of Fat Phobia"

Ragen Chastain — Activist, writer, Guinness World Record holder

Lindo Bacon — "Health at Every Size"

Da'Shaun Harrison — "Belly of the Beast"

These scholars center the lived experiences of fat people and challenge weight-centric paradigms in medicine and public health

The Problem with BMI

Fat liberationist critique of Body Mass Index:

  • Historical origins: Developed in the 1800s by Adolphe Quetelet using only white, athletic men — his work laid groundwork for eugenics
  • Modern BMI (1972): Ancel Keys also measured only male and younger bodies
  • Rooted in racism and misogyny: Fatness historically associated with women of color; BMI reflects racist and sexist beauty standards
  • Poor health predictor: Cannot determine health by looking at someone; BMI ignores muscle mass, bone density, overall fitness
"The BMI is a prime example of weight stigma in scientific literature — healthy fat people are called 'the obesity paradox' because it's considered absurd that fat people could actually be healthy"
Health at Every Size (HAES®)

An evidence-based, weight-neutral approach to health

Five Core Principles:

  • Weight Inclusivity
  • Health Enhancement
  • Respectful Care
  • Eating for Well-being
  • Life-Enhancing Movement

Key Philosophy:

"Pursuing health is neither a moral imperative nor an individual obligation, and health status should never be used to judge, oppress, or determine the value of an individual"

HAES® reconceptualizes health as being on a continuum, changing throughout life — a resource, not a goal of living
What Research Shows About HAES®

Multiple systematic reviews demonstrate HAES® interventions produce positive outcomes:

  • Psychological benefits: Improved body image, self-esteem, reduced eating disorder symptoms
  • Behavioral improvements: Better relationship with food, intuitive eating, reduced disordered eating
  • Physical health: Improved cardiovascular markers, blood pressure, and metabolic health — even without weight loss
  • Quality of life: 73% of participants who maintained or gained weight improved quality of life
  • Sustainability: Benefits maintained over time (longer than traditional weight loss interventions)

Important: 34% of participants who maintained or gained weight still improved cardiometabolic risk factors

The Hidden Harm: Weight Cycling

Weight cycling (yo-yo dieting) is more common in fat people due to societal pressure to lose weight

  • Cardiovascular harm: Weight cycling associated with increased risk of heart disease
  • Metabolic impacts: Can worsen metabolic health over time
  • Eating disorders: Dieting is a strong risk factor for disordered eating and eating disorders
  • Research blind spot: Rarely considered as confounding factor when studying weight and health
"It is hard to say for certain whether worse health outcomes in larger-bodied people are due to weight itself, or due to confounders such as weight cycling"
— University of Illinois Chicago School of Public Health
Moving Toward Health Justice

Combating fatphobia is both a matter of social justice and a means of improving public health

  • Healthcare: Train providers on weight stigma; ensure adequate equipment; focus on health behaviors, not weight as primary outcome
  • Research: Account for weight stigma, discrimination, weight cycling, and social determinants in studies
  • Public health: End campaigns that increase weight stigma; promote movement for joy rather than weight loss
  • Language: Use neutral language; let individuals self-identify; avoid pathologizing bodies
  • Access: Ensure equal access to healthcare regardless of body size; remove weight restrictions
Key Takeaways
  • Fatphobia directly harms health through stress, discrimination, and healthcare barriers
  • Weight stigma may account for more than 25% of the relationship between weight and health outcomes
  • Medical fatphobia leads to diagnostic errors, delayed care, and healthcare avoidance
  • Most research fails to account for the health impacts of discrimination itself
  • Health at Every Size® approaches show positive health outcomes without focusing on weight loss
  • Fat liberation scholars center lived experiences and challenge weight-centric paradigms
  • Healthy bodies come in all sizes — you cannot determine health by looking at someone
End Weight Stigma, Improve Health Outcomes
Learn more from fat liberation scholars and support weight-inclusive healthcare
1 / 14